CATHOLICISM AND THE UFO REALITY
David Ben Yakov
I preface this document by making a disclaimer. Some might
well see the title of this article and think that it is an attempt to malign the
Catholic people. Please read the entire contents of the article. I love Catholic
people and most of my ancestors were of the Catholic faith. The purpose of this
article is to show how Roman Catholicism, in its perpetual attempt to win converts and
keep those who are already in the church, will use any means possible even if it means embracing
new ideas, though they are unsound or unholy according to Yahweh and his Holy Word,
The article below and the interview that follows concern a
certain Monsignor in the Roman Catholic religion. When I was talking to
Resistance Brother Jeff about this article he asked me what a Monsignor is and I
didn't know. So, after a bit of study in the Wikipedia Online Encyclopedia the
following definition and description is offered.
Monsignor is an ecclesiastical honorific for
clergy of the Roman Catholic, Eastern Catholic, and
Episcopalian churches. The word derives from the French
Mon Seigneur, meaning "my lord". In English, it is
abbreviated Mgr., Msgr. or Mons.
In some European languages Monsignor (or its
equivalent) is the simple style for bishops (including
archbishops) who are not cardinals, as opposed to the formal
style of Your Excellency. In English-speaking
countries, however, the title of Monsignor is not given to
bishops, but only to those priests who have been included in
the Pontifical Family under one or more of the following
- Apostolic Protonotaries (the highest and least
- Honorary Prelates of His Holiness (formerly
- Chaplains of His Holiness (formerly "Papal
Chamberlain" or "Papal Chaplain")
The title of Papal chamberlain (Cameriere di spada e
cappa) was one of the highest honours that could be
bestowed on a Catholic layman by the Pope, and was often
given to members of noble families. It was mostly an
honorary position, but a chamberlain served the Pope for one
week per year during official ceremonies. Franz von Papen
was probably the most famous modern chamberlain.
A number of changes in the office of Monsignor were
introduced by Pope Paul VI's motu proprio Pontificalis
Domus of 28 March 1968. One year later, an Instruction
of the Secretariat of State simplified the dress and the
forms of address.
Before these reforms, the monsignori or lesser prelates
were divided into at least 14 different grades, including
domestic prelates, four kinds of protonotaries apostolic,
four kinds of papal chamberlains, and at least five types of
papal chaplains. Chamberlains and chaplains were grouped
together as chaplains, a specifically priestly-sounding
category. Papal Chamberlains were formerly called "Very
Reverend Monsignor" and the higher ranks "Right Reverend
Monsignor". In the reform this was simplified to prescribe
for all the form "Reverend Monsignor", often reduced simply
to "Monsignor". Papal Chamberlains used to be appointed only
for the lifetime of the Pope, so that the appointment had to
be obtained anew from his successor. This distinction too
was eliminated by Pope Paul VI.
Chaplains of His Holiness may use a purple-trimmed black
cassock with purple sash. Honorary prelates use a
red-trimmed black cassock with purple sash. The red is the
same shade as that used by bishops. Honorary prelates use a
purple cassock as their choir dress.
Apostolic Protonotaries can be numerary or supernumerary.
The former are very few, usually seven, who have an actual
function to perform in the direct service of the Pope.
Appointment as an Apostolic Protonotaries Supernumerary is
simply the award of a title with certain privileges. Their
dress is the same as for Honorary Prelates except that they
have the option of also using a purple ferraiuolo or
cape. In English-speaking countries, they sometimes add the
letters, "P.A." (for Protonotarius Apostolicus) after
Apostolic Protonotaries de numero (and other
superior prelates of the offices of the Roman curia who are
not bishops) have the same dress as other Apostolic
Protonotaries, but wear the mantelletta in choir. They may
be addressed as "Most Reverent Monsignor" (as is also
allowed when addressing bishops), and may wear a black
biretta with a red tuft.
Vicars general have the rank of Apostolic Protonotary
durante munere and are therefore styled Monsignor
as long as they hold that office. Episcopal vicars are often
accorded the same title under less-specific rules of
Well, after reading all of that are you confused? Now can you
see why Yahweh hates politics in the Church? When you read in Revelation about
how Yeshua hates the practices of the Nicolatians you now know why. When I stand
before Yeshua I want Him to say "welcome David, my good and faithful servant."
People with authority like above will come in announce themselves a high
potentate rootin tootin the grand pubah of the ninth district of (you pick the
city) and in most cases Yeshua will say, "depart from me workers of evil as I
never knew you." These sort of people spend their whole lives climbing the
corporate ladder of Catholicism (and other mainline sects) blind to the real intent of what
true service is. If
you're reading this and are in the religious hierarchy of the Catholic or any
other similar structured church and are offended, well maybe you need to be
offended in order to wake up. But those of you who still have some inkling of
truth in you will realize that what I've written is the truth and perhaps you'll
be led to true repentance.
It is no secret that we at the Delusion Resistance are
fighters of what is called extraterrestrial, whether it be the beings that pass
themselves off as being outer worldly; or the philosophy that they perpetuate.
With that in mind, I'd like to present to you an article that was featured in
the MUFON (Mutual UFO Network) Journal, May of 2006. Below is that article.
Let's read it and then talk about it a little bit:
Monsignor Corrado Balducci says Mexico
blessed with UFO Sightings
By Paola Leopizzi Harris
At a conference in Rome organized by
Starworks Italia and Area 51 Magazine featuring special guest Mexican
journalist Jamie Maussan, Monsignor Corrado Balducci told the audience that
Mexico was blessed with so many sightings because of its incredible openness
He says he will continue to be spokesman
for the opening up of public opinion and church attention toward the people
from the stars. "I will ask the Vatican to dedicate the religious feast
Christ, and King of the Universe to include "all its inhabitants."
Both Maussan and Monsignor Balducci were
awarded the International George Adamski Award at the event in Rome.
Maussan explained to the audience that he
became interested in the UFO phenomenon after viewing them when they
appeared during the last solar eclipse over Mexico.
"After that," he said, "I told the Mexican
people to look to the skies to record the objects with their digital
cameras. Now, I have more footage of flotillas, of moving orbs, and of
flying humanoids than any other journalist."
"I am now getting films of live aliens
after showing the amateur cell phone footage taken by boys playing soccer
who encountered a tall being who tried to grab one of the boys." [See
February 2006 Journal.]
After seeing these films, Monsignor
Balducci said that the Vatican is very interested in this phenomenon, and
that he was designated spokesman.
He told the audience that he had written a
note about the importance of his presence at the x-conference in Washington,
DC, in 2005 to the current Pope Benedict the sixteenth, and that he also
knew that the late Pope John Paul followed his TV appearances speaking about
He added that, in the Bible, Jesus is
called "King of the Universe" and that in this phrase it is understood as
the "universe and its inhabitants."
"There is such a variety of animal and
plant species on the planet, do we not assume God would only create one type
of life?" he asks. "I always wish to be the spokesman for these star peoples
who also are part of God's glory, and I will continue to bring it to the
attention of the Holy Mother Church."
"Opinions in favor of the habitability of
other worlds are held not only by secular scientists, but also theologists
and people who died and were made saints."
"I can also mention Cardinal Cusano
(1402-1464), who wrote, 'There is no star from which we are authorized to
exclude the existence of beings, who may even be different to us.'"
"The Jesuit and astronomer, Father Angelo
Secchi (1818-1866), wrote, 'It's absurd to consider the worlds that surround
us as uninhabited deserts.' And I could go on."
Oh, where should I begin to dissect this article. Well, let's
start with the Catholic Church appointing Balducci spokesman for the Vatican
concerning the UFO phenomena. By doing this act, the Roman church has officially
accepted an extraterrestrial reality. This should in no way come as a shock to
anyone who has studied this entity (the church) in any depth. Catholicism has
always gone out of it's way to adopt many of the traditions of any and all
societies that it has infiltrated. In Mexico and other Latin American cultures
the church accepts and participates in such events as "The Day of The Dead," a
day to celebrate dead ancestors; a pagan festival. As a matter of fact, in all
of Latin America, Catholicism had compromised true faith in Yeshua in order to
gain converts. It seems that quantity is more important than quality where the
church in Rome is concerned. It would be no different that a Christian becoming
a bartender, offering people the mind altering drug of alcohol and then claiming
that they were doing it to evangelize the "happy hour" crowd. Whenever Holiness
is compromised it rarely leads to righteousness, but to utter destruction.
So the Pope follows the antics of Monsignor Balducci? Well,
throughout history Popes have endorsed a variety of debacles and travesties.
Popes gave lands and rewards to those who murdered upwards of 70 million Bible
believing Christians over the centuries. My German heritage is low royalty and
acquired land from just such a sin. Popes have condoned inquisitions, pogroms
and other atrocities. Popes have presided over counsels that have in essence
elevated Yeshua's mother to equality with and even higher authority than her son;
the only Begotten of El Elyon. The fruits of the Popes are for the most part, rotten
worm ridden emblems barely hanging on a diseased tree. So, when the article says
that the Popes and their many minions are keeping an eye on the extraterrestrial
agenda; it doesn't only not surprise me, but it makes me remark, "man, about
time they admitted it."
Is Yeshua called "King of The Universe" in the Bible? A study
of the King James Version and the Catholic Bible (The Latin Vulgate) yield no
such phrase. Sure, one can find scriptures that imply that Yeshua is King of The
Universe, and we know it to be true, but Balducci is quoting a phrase (quotation marks his, not mine) that
is not there. So much for his being a respected theologian.
Then the issues of "being made saints" come into view. Anyone
who has read the Bible knows that saints are people who come to faith in Yeshua
through a Born Again relationship with The Father through Yeshua. Faith in
makes people saints, not some starched collared bigot who thinks that he is
God's vicar on earth.
But we've been able to save the best for last. Balducci talks
about two men (Catholic scholars) who supposedly prove to him that acceptance of
an extraterrestrial reality is not a new idea in the church realm. First we have
Cardinal Cusano who believed that people actually lived on stars. He didn't
mention planets, but stars. Star systems (stars with planets orbiting them) were
not a concept during the time that Cusano lived. As a matter of fact, in his
time it was universally accepted that Earth was unique in the universe and a
special abode for creation of life; and the only abode at that. It was also
thought at that time that the earth stood in one place and that the sun and
planets orbited the earth. Amusingly enough, it was also thought that the earth
was flat; something that Columbus, some 28 years after the death of Cusano had
in the the back of his head during his trip to the new world. Also note that it
wasn't until 1530 that Copernicus published his De
Revolutionibus which proved the true state of the
solar system and the movements of the planets.
We then come to who Balducci titles; "The Jesuit and
astronomer, Father Angelo Secchi" who claimed that it was absurd that the
surrounding planets in our solar system were deserts that could not support
life. Gee, who do I want to believe; a Jesuit astronomer who made an ignorant
claim, or the many space craft that have flown by all of those worlds and found
some of them to be desert wastelands, some uninhabitable ice worlds, and some, giant worlds
with noxious and poisonous gas that would make life impossible. I think I'll
side with the scientific and photographic proof.
Sorry Monsignor Balducci, but your suppositions are cracked
vessels that can hold no water and your supposed theologians are at the very
best quite ignorant. Bailiff, call the next witness.
AND HERE'S AN INTERVIEW WITH
Before we go on to scrutinize the next article I have to
make something clear. I found this article on the internet and it was in raw
text format. The article clearly stated that the author wanted to be contacted
before the article was used in any publication. There was not a copyright
assigned to the article, but one was implied by the request. The Delusion
Resistance has tried numerous ways to contact the author. The e-mail address at
the beginning of the article is no good; the mail being rejected with a "mailbox
not found" error. Writing to the author of the website resulted in our being
told that he didn't have any address for Mr. Forgione. Finally, letters sent to an
Italian magazine where Mr. Forgione is said to be a contributor have yielded no
response. Therefore, we consider this article to be public domain. My notes will
be interspersed after each answer and will be italicized.
Interview with Monsignor Corrado Balducci
"Other intelligent beings exist"
The reality of the UFO phenomenon and its theological implications: using
reason, extraterrestrials are here. A glimpse of their nature and a mention of
the Third Secret of Fatima.
by Adriano Forgione
Italian by Dawn A. Bissel)
I met Monsignor Corrado Balducci at the Second Ufological Conference of Ancona,
entitled "Alien civilizations: between doubt and reason" on 17 April 1999.
Balducci, a demonologist of the Vatican is a very open person with a pleasant
manner who is quite well known in the ufological circuit for having openly
declared that he believes in the possibility that extraterrestrial intelligences
are interacting with Earth. Are his statements made on behalf of the Vatican? I
tried to examine the religious repercussions of contact with Monsignor Balducci.
Monsignor, where does your interest in extraterrestrial intelligences spring
I really became interested in ufology a couple of years ago, even though I
started talking about it on TV about four years ago, in 1995. Actually, it all
started in 1959 when I began to devote my time to studying demonology. As I had
to explore fields such as psychiatry and parapsychology, I indirectly came into
contact with topics linked to ufology. I remember that in the Fifties, there was
a tendency to deny at all costs the object of parapsychological studies amongst
the public, some scientists and also amongst us clergymen. They said that there
was no basis for acknowledging parapsychology and phenomena which were called
nonsense and fantasy. To put it simply, they denied everything. This was
reflected in ufology, which is linked to other frontier topics. As I collected
material, I realized that this generalized denial stemmed from illogical
fanaticism. There must be something there, even if you just use your common
sense, and, using reason, the phenomenon is undeniable. Strict criticism goes
against common sense because it goes against the value of human testimonies. In
recent years, accounts of ufological events have greatly increased and yet there
are still too many people who tend to pass everything off as nonsense. Of
course, in many cases, natural phenomena for example, may be wrongly
interpreted, but it's absolutely unthinkable to put everything into that
category. Total skepticism is completely unjustified.
First, Mr. Balducci says that he has studied demonology and
parapsychology. Demonology is pretty easy to define; the study of demons and
their behavior. Some sources on the internet ascribe the title of exorcist to
Mr. Balducci, which would fit into this scenario. Separating demonology from
parapsychology is something that someone not versed in these things might see as
a valid practice. But, when you consider that those of us who have had brushes
with demons and know their practices and manifestations know that reality,
parapsychology is only the study of the effects of demonic activity. As a matter
of fact, the definition of parapsychology in the Merriam Webster Online
Main Entry: para·psy·chol·o·gy
Etymology: International Scientific Vocabulary
: a field of study concerned with the investigation of evidence for
paranormal psychological phenomena (as telepathy, clairvoyance, and
It would be akin to someone studying baseball pitchers (pitcherology)
and then also studying (throwingology), words made up of course, but only to
prove a point.
Now if a person studied demonology they would be familiar
with several aspects of demons; assuming of course that they were being taught
right. Lord knows that the Catholic Church takes some bizarre turns in its
teaching on what should be simple Biblical precepts, so I guess that perhaps
their stance on demonology could be warped too. Aside from that, a simple study
of UFO's, their behavior; their supposed occupants and their behavior; and the
anti-Christian message that they promote tips off even the most novice
researcher that these entities are anti-Bible and anti-Christ. The only way that
a person could not see it is if they are biased toward the "aliens" and blinded
because of that bias.
And what's happening at the moment in your field?
I've never told anyone this, but I'll tell you: some theologists have said to
me "Balducci, what are you doing, it's all just fantasy! ", and they were
important theologists, not just anyone. Then when I explained my interest, I
defended it tooth and nail so as to say that it's time to change this attitude
because if we go on like this, we'll end up weakening and destroying the value
of human testimonies. This is what worries me because human testimonies are the
basis for our life as an individual, our life in society but above all the basis
for the spiritual life of Christians, given that the Divine Revelation is a
historical fact that was testified to. God's Revelation is testified to by
people and by the gospels. If we believe in the accounts of Biblical miracles,
then using reason, we must also believe the accounts of extraordinary events
that happen today. It's obvious that we must prove that every affirmation is
based on credible foundations. Above all, I decided to get involved in ufology
in order to defend human testimonies.
When answering the second question, Mr. Balducci goes out
of his way to stress that when dealing with the UFO question, we have to
consider the testimonies. He alludes to the fact that testimonies are very
important, even talking about the Gospels in the Bible and how they were written
by witnesses to the events enclosed therein. I agree that testimonies are very
important. But Mr. Balducci left out that there are many testimonies that prove
that the entities that purport to come to us from other worlds often show that
they are not benign, but in fact hostile. What about the testimonies of forced
abduction, rape, physical examination against the will of the victim and the
psychological scars that so many abductees have.
What about the evidence that comes to us from people who
claim that they have been given a special message concerning the religious state
of this world. Many of those messages refer to Messiah Yeshua (whom Balducci
also claims to represent) saying he's not divine, but one of their own who came
to enlighten the world. Mr. Balducci, make up your mind; either you're for
Messiah Yeshua, the only begotten Son of God, or you're not. You can't serve two
And finally, what about the testimonies that prove that
abductions can be stopped by using the name of Yeshua (Jesus). On our
PAAPSI site we have
numerous cases where abductions were terminated using Yeshua's name. If Mr. Balducci were really a bonafide demonologist he would know that the demons quake
at the mere mention of Yeshua's name. Two plus two still equals four in our
universe Mr. Balducci.
On various occasions you have said that the occupants of UFOs could be more
highly evolved spiritually than we are.
I must start by saying that angels do not use spaceships. As purely spiritual
beings, they are where they want to be and if they wanted to show themselves,
they wouldn't have any trouble taking on visible forms. So, when we talk
about extraterrestrials, we have to think either of beings like us or,
preferably, other types of beings who always combine a spiritual part with a
material part, a body, even though they have a different relationship compared
with us terrestrial humans.
It's true that angels are spiritual beings.
It is also true that they can manifest in the physical. But who is to say that
an angel can't manifest as a UFO to dupe the beholder. In every account of
abduction that I have read about, the victim becomes immobilized and even if
they are not, all mention that they have appeared to be in an altered state of
reality. Mr. Balducci evidently doesn't know the true makeup of the human being.
Every human has three parts, the body, the soul (mind) and the spirit. He seems
to be ignorant of the fact that each of us is a spiritual being as well as a
physical being. We always combine a spiritual form with a physical one, but are
blind to this because of our fallen state. If Balducci had read his Bible at any
length he would know this. Yeshua himself made a statement on the Mount of
Olives when the disciples had fallen asleep after he had asked them to be alert
and pray for him. He said, "the spirit is willing, but the flesh is weak." By
the testimony of the very person Balducci is supposed to represent here on earth
we can see that mere humans are fleshly beings, each one having a unique spirit
of his or her own.
And yes Mr. Balducci, angels of either
variety, godly or fallen, can manifest in the physical. In the case of
extraterrestrials, that form is often a little gray creature, but sometimes come
in reptilian or insectoid varieties. And Mr. Balducci, you can bet your life
that they have a different relationship with Yahweh than we do. They have fallen
and have no chance whatsoever at any redemptive process to bring themselves back
to Yahweh. Their state is such that Yahweh created a special place for them to
live for eternity, and if you haven't read it sir, it is called the Lake of
Fire. You sir, on the other hand, have a chance like the rest of humanity of
getting right with Yahweh and I pray that you do it before it's too late!
Nowadays, science accepts the existence of forms of life in the cosmos, even
though it doesn't want to take into account the fact that these intelligences
could already be here in our planetary sphere, at least in an obvious form. How
does theology tackle this problem?
Opinions in favour of the habitability of other worlds are held not only by
secular scientists, but also theologists and people who died and were made
saints like Padre Pio. The book written in 1974 by the priest Don Nello Castello,
"Padre Pio" ("Thus Spoke Padre Pio"), says that someone in Padre Pio's
confraternity asked him "Father, I thought Earth was nothing compared to the
stars and all the other planets", to which Padre Pio replied "Yes, and if we
leave the Earth we are nothing. The Lord certainly didn't restrict his glory to
this little planet. On other planets, there will be beings without sin.". I can
also mention Cardinal Niccol Cusano (1401-1464) who wrote "there is no star from
which we are authorized to exclude the existence of beings, who may even
be different to us". The Jesuit and astronomer, Father Angelo Secchi (1818-1866)
wrote "It's absurd to consider the worlds that surround us as uninhabited
deserts". And I could go on and on. Of course, we still don't have scientific
confirmation of this particular issue. However, in the field of theology and the
Scriptures we can make some observations. As God's power is limitless, it is not
only possible but also likely that inhabited planets exist. In fact, there is a
great difference between angels, who are purely spiritual beings, and ourselves,
who are made of spirit and matter and whose soul is limited in its actions by
the abilities of the body itself. This is explained by the axiom that Nature
doesn't take jumps. And so it's likely that the distance between us and angels
is reduced by beings who, although they have a body, maybe a more perfect one,
have a soul which is less conditioned in its evolution. Probably, not only is
this possible and likely but, in my opinion, also desirable. In a not so distant
future, these beings could help us, especially on our spiritual path.
I find it quite interesting that Mr.
Balducci quotes the figures above with such adoration. For instance, he has no
problem quoting an individual named Padre Pio. This person had the audacity to
say that he's convinced that there are planets out in the cosmos that harbor
beings that have no sin. Padre Pio obviously didn't take into account that the
whole universe is suffering from atrophy. Basically, that means that it is in a
decaying state. This process is a result of sin and sin happened with the
rebellion of Adam and Eve. So, if the universe is in decay from the consequences
of sin then it is impossible that some planet can have beings who do not suffer
the ravages of sin. What this statement is setting people up for is the lie that
someday will be perpetuated from beings that will come to earth claiming to have
the answers for all of our society's ills. They in fact even claim now through
their contactees that they are more highly evolved than humankind. Mr. Balducci
has bought into the lie and the great delusion and he is teaching it. Be careful
Mr. Balducci, even now you're being fitted for quite a large millstone.
I find it quite alarming how, at the end of
his answer to this question, it appears that he is setting the stage; preparing
if you will, the world for the return of the Nephilim. It is the opinion of not
only myself, but many other researchers, that the sperm and ovum that are taken
from abductees are being used to create a race of soulless humans who will be
infested with the spirits of demons. Anyone who has done serious study of demons
knows that the are only the spirits of the Nephilim that lived before the flood
and in some cases after the same event. Yahweh has restricted the angels from
mating directly with human females like they did before the flood. So, in lieu
of that, they are creating bodies so that their sons can live yet again and
enslave the world. So it comes as no surprise to me that Mr. Balducci, by making
the statement that the beings who will come to help us in our spiritual path
will be beings who are less evolved than angels but more evolved than human
beings. That is exactly what the Nephilim were and will be again.
Some researchers think that this already happened in the past.
That's an interesting point. It's arguable that these beings have been
protecting and helping us for a long time. Some people have put forward the
hypothesis that some disasters have been avoided thanks to them. If intelligent
beings from other planets really existed, we would find the solution as to how
to reconcile their existence with Christ's redemption. If Christ is the centre
and head of all creation, no world exists which doesn't refer to Christ, as
everything is under the influence of the divine Word and His glory. And no glory
is possible without the existence of intelligent beings who can understand it.
In any case, it's absurd to think that the only form of
intelligence is our own. Other intellectual forces, different to the human one
and constructed with a different type of structure is not only possible, but
Mr. Balducci is quite crafty in the
statement he makes, saying that if intelligent beings from other worlds existed,
we would find the solution as to how to reconcile their existence with Christ's
redemption. In the prior section, he quotes a source that says it is possible
that there are worlds where there is no sin. So what is it Mr. Balducci, sin or
no sin? Why all of the circular reasoning? Well, because the whole subject when
presented from the world view or a pseudo-Biblical view can only survive with
the use of circular reasoning. Linear reasoning destroys the concept. If a
Biblical concept is used in a linear form, starting from Yahweh and ending with
Yahweh, and we use Yahweh's Word then the only explanation for extraterrestrials
really points to demonic and evil angelic entities.
But if you're a Catholic what should really
scare you is the phrase that Mr. Balducci uses; "If Christ is the centre and
head of all creation.." and should be viewed as suspect of what Balducci really
believes. The use of the word "if" causes one to think that Balducci really
questions if Messiah is the center. A person who was sure of Messiah's role in
the scheme of things would have used a better word, like the word, "since." Who
does Balducci really represent, one has to wonder?
As a student of the Bible for quite a few
years I've found that if one studies it quite carefully and diligently, one can
find that it has the answer for every question, even in this contemporary time.
I feel, and I do believe that my sentiment would be echoed by many other Bible
believing Christians, that if Yahweh had created other intelligences (tangible
ones that is) He would have told us in His Word. There is no mention in His Word of
life existing on other worlds. Maybe that is why so many of the messages that
are channeled by mediums or given to abductees from these beings go to such
lengths to discredit the Bible. It's food for thought. So Mr. Balducci should be
careful when He says it's absurd to think that life doesn't exist elsewhere. If
Yahweh didn't create something it is absurd to believe that it exists.
Is your research personal or is it on behalf of the Vatican?
It's personal. Twenty years ago, Father Domenico Grasso spoke publicly in
favour of the UFO phenomenon. Was it personal research for him too? This
research is absolutely personal. The Vatican doesn't decide anything. We aren't
told "study this or study that" but it gives great freedom of action to
individuals. In the Vatican will be pleased when it knows that Balducci too has
spoken about ufology. We don't work according to specific orders, absolutely
Okay, but what about guilt by association?
The Catholic Church had no problem sanctioning the murder of millions of
Protestants during the Reformation and it has never resolved to remove the over
100 anathemas against Protestants. It had no problem with the Inquisitions or
other persecutions. Point made; that when the Vatican wants something done it
gets done and when it wants something stopped, it will go out of its way to see
that it is stopped. The only time that the Vatican gives freedom to individuals
is when it knows that the end will justify the means. With that in mind, I find
no problem believing that Balducci is working as an investigator and perhaps an
ambassador to the so called extraterrestrial agenda. And as is quite evident,
he's a great public relations manager for the same cause.
In your opinion, what are the possible implications of the phenomenon for our
current civilization or for the near future, if we acknowledge a possible
interaction between man and extraterrestrial intelligences?
That's a question which leads me to think that it would be better if we knew
what these beings are like. I have already gone into this and I justified my
opinion with "likely". What you want to know depends on whether they are
inferior or superior to us. If they are like us, there wouldn't be many
implications, as they could have a civilization on the same level as our own. It
would be different if they were superior beings. In that case a lot of
presuppositions could change.
Okay, so here we have a person who has been
studying (at the time of this writing) for 47 years. He started the same year
that I was born, 1959. Yet, with all of this time to study, with his supposed
intellect concerning demonology, parapsychology and all of the testimonies that
point to the malignancy of these entities; he still can't figure out if the good
guys or bad guys.
Okay Mr. Balducci, let's look at the facts.
If they were tangible beings they would have to have a sin nature, since the
universe is in atrophy and decay; direct results of a fallen creation. Since
that is the case, if they were on the same level as us, they would have to be in
decay spiritually. Look at human society today Mr. Balducci, would you want
beings like us visiting us; I sure wouldn't. If they were superior beings then
they would be in a greater degree of decay (sin) which all the evidence seems to
point to. Fallen angels are just that, fallen, and fallen farther than we are
because they were in the direct presence of Yahweh and yet still rebelled.
But the sad story is that Balducci's
sentiments are held by many in society. That is why when the Nephilim finally do
arrive, and they have the answers to all of life's mysteries, can heal diseases
and give man a false sense of security; people will flock to them like they are
messianic figures. Sad state of affairs we have today and they will only get
According to some studies, visions of Blessed Virgin Mary are connected to
the UFO phenomenon. Some associated phenomena seem to be of a ufological nature.
What do you think?
It's absolutely out of the question. For pity's sake, Our Lady can do what
she wants, and definitely doesn't need a UFO.
Looks like the interviewer really hit a raw
nerve with that question. Isn't it sad that Balducci said a couple of questions
prior, "If Christ is the centre and Head of all Creation.." yet when the
validity of Mary is brought up she is defended like she has preeminence over El Elyon's own Son. Simply put, manifestations of Mary are simply an evil
principality that comes in a Mary mask to deceive those who have throw out
Messiah. It is the same apparition that ancient societies knew as Astarte,
Athena, Diana and occultists today refer to as the Queen of Heaven or the
Mother. Come on Balducci, you studied demonology, or so you say, so you should
Two years ago, an article was published in 'Il Messagero' which quoted some
of your statements about a nuclear war and a celestial cataclysm which will
happen within ten years.
That was a sensationalist article. The truth is, I said that they are two
risks we are running. The nearest is a nuclear world war, a danger that's more
real when there are two powers involved. So, I speculated on who could be a
possible opponent for America, and I said China or the Arab world, but I didn't
mean that this would happen tomorrow. I pointed out that for near future I meant
around 2030. China first has to develop its commerce and industry to the point
where it has enough military power to involve the West in a future war. (At the
time of the interview, the war in Kosovo was already under way - Ed). The danger
could also be that Russia, being in a destitute state, has already sold arms,
technology and people to Third World countries. But I think that however small a
country is, it thinks before dropping an atomic bomb on the USA.
Finally, something we can agree on. It looks
like Balducci perhaps has read his Bible a little bit anyway. Can you say
Ezekiel 38-39. But one thing I disagree about is the time frame. Perhaps we
should consider sometime before 2012.
And what do you think the other, more distant danger is? An asteroid hitting Earth.
I hadn't thought of that. I was actually referring to
an ecological crisis which is growing because of the increase in pollution which
is faster than any human corrective measure. But of course I'm not talking about
only surviving ten years.
Well Mr. Balducci, did you ever hear of the
Book of Revelation? Check it out where it talks about a mountain falling into
the sea. Asteroid maybe? Wait till Yahweh starts pouring out His wrath on Earth,
you're going to see one heck of an ecological disaster.
Staying with this issue, in an edition of the magazine 'Visto' three years
ago, you partly confirmed the text of the Third Secret of Fatima which has been
around for thirty years but has never been backed by the Church.
Yes. There are two things in the Third Secret of Fatima. Everyone noticed the
first, but very few noticed the second. The first tells of a nuclear war before
the end of the millennium. From the context, that's clear. In fact, the text
talks about the use of arms that are more powerful than a thousand suns. It's
clear what arms are intended if we look at what the text goes on to say: "the
living will envy the dead". This means that the people who survive the nuclear
weapons will suffer from radiation. The other, less known aspect, is the
doctrinal crisis of the Church. Three years ago, I was interviewed by Canadian
TV. I said: "Yes, the Madonna of the Third Secret of Fatima says this, but
no-one has noticed that she first says that it will happen if mankind doesn't
mend its ways.". So its all conditioned by this previous remark. But I am
optimistic. We, as people, can influence the realization of a prophecy, change
the date and the intensity of the prophesied events and mitigate them. The
renewal of spirituality in the young is a good omen. I mean to say, spirituality
based on the rules of the Church.
What is the evidence of a false prophet?
Well, it is that the prophecy doesn't come to be. I didn't notice a nuclear war
before the end of the millennium, did anyone else? Looks like the Madonna has a
bad batting average. Sorry, I'll continue to rely on God's Word for my prophetic
So the Madonna says that things can be
averted if mankind changes and mend's its ways. Isn't it interesting how so many
channelers are getting messages from their demons that say the same thing. But
they go one step farther. They say that if mankind doesn't mend its ways then
the extraterrestrials will come to rescue us at a time of great distress,
ecologically speaking. They say that the earth (which they believe to be a
living entity) will try to destroy mankind and then they will intervene,
bringing us to our next evolutionary level. Gee, do you think that Madonna and
the demonic realm have the same information source? They should, they are one and the same.
At first I was offended at how Balducci said
that people could change prophecy by changing their ways. Well, first of all,
Fatima was a false prophecy. Changing something that is false is easy, you just
create another deception. Cults have been doing that for years. Biblically
speaking, there are two types of prophecies, tentative and affirmative. A
example of a tentative prophecy would be Jonah's prophecy over Nineveh. When he
finally decided to do what Yahweh told him to do, he prophesied to Nineveh that
slated for destruction and that if they repented then Yahweh would not destroy
the city. Nineveh repented and the city was spared. There are quite a few
tentative prophecies in the Tenach and very few of them were heeded and the
prophecy was then fulfilled. An example of an affirmative prophecy can be seen
where Cyrus the Persian was concerned. Isaiah proclaimed in chapter 44 verse 28;
150 years before Cyrus ruled Babylon, that he would be the one to rebuild the
temple in Jerusalem, and history records that he made such a proclamation.
Anyway, Balducci tries to tell us that the Marian vision was a tentative
prophecy, saying that if mankind improved itself the nuclear war would not
happen. But mankind hasn't improved itself. Plus, the real clincher is that a
time frame is given; the declaration that the nuclear war would happen before
the end of the millennium. It is currently six years after the millennium
started and I'm not glowing in the dark!
Do you believe that non-terrestrial intelligences could intervene in a
possible future cataclysm?
I've already said that it's possible for these beings to come to the aid of
mankind. Anyway, we shouldn't expect help from anyone, it has to be us
who change and mature.
But I'll bet that he really wanted to add to
the end of the answer, [but if we don't, they will come and help us to mature.]
Balducci isn't a man who lives up to the
credentials that he claims to possess. He claims to be a demonologist but he
really doesn't know about demonic activity. If he did, he would be able to
equate it with extraterrestrial activity. He obviously has some sort of mind
knowledge about the person of Yeshua, but no heart knowledge of Him. He's a
Monsignor, which means that he should know about the character and qualities of
Yahweh, yet he can't even resolve in his mind or heart if Yeshua is the center
and head of all creation. He enforces the common Catholic Marian conception that
she is equal in status to her son, the only begotten of El Elyon. He quotes
three persons who are in error, all of them Catholic theologians. The two older
sources knew nothing of the true nature of our solar system and show their
ignorance by what they say. The third person, who is a priest and should know
scripture and the fallen state mankind and the universe makes a blanket
statement that there could be planets in the cosmos that contain beings who
possess no sin. The list goes on and on. Can such a person be trusted for giving
information that could make the difference between a person's soul going to hell
or to heaven? I say no. Here's a new campaign slogan; "Just say no to Balducci."
Mr. Balducci is a dangerous man. He is deceived
and in a position of high authority. He has potential influence over perhaps
more than a billion Catholic souls around the world. Calling the Mexico
sightings a blessing and teaching those souls that extraterrestrials (evil angels and demons)
are good, and passing them off as potential saviors is one sad state of affairs. The Bible is
quite emphatic about teachers being more accountable in God's eyes on the Day of
It is my estimation that he is a valuable tool of the enemy.
Why do I say this? Well, I see the Catholic Church as being the main catalyst
for the one world church that will exist during these last days. This religion,
known as Mystery Babylon, will be the culmination of all faiths, with the
exception of a remnant of people who will not participate in her idolatries.
When the time is ripe, a man who we know as the anti-Christ will emerge,
probably ushered in, by some sort of extraterrestrial reality. People like
Balducci will be the first to stand up and proclaim these entities as the
saviors of the world and will most likely proclaim anti-Christ to be god.
It is an unfortunate reality that people in most faiths don't
like to think for themselves. Given the choice, they would receive a lie told to
them rather than investigating the truth for themselves. People in higher
authority in Catholicism will sell the lie to those who refuse to think for
themselves and it will result in the biggest cosmic deception that will every
come upon mankind.
Right now, people like Balducci are like some sort of tempter
of misguided children. They leave a loose trail of candy for the deceived to
follow and the trail leads to utter destruction. It is my hope and prayer that
by publishing things like this article that I will cause people to think. Sure,
some will be offended. But I would rather have a thousand potential thinkers mad
at me than to have one ignorant person on the road to hell. If you are a
Catholic soul and you're mad at me then praise God. Get mad, get pissed, curse
me and threaten me. I'll accept that gladly if it causes you to think about why
you're mad and it causes you to question the validity of what your priests,
bishops, cardinals and even the Pope have force fed you over the years. If I can
shed light on people like Balducci to just one of you than it is worth all the
effort, criticism and abuse.
If you're not of the Catholic faith and you adhere to people
like Balducci because it shows you that even so called Christians believe like
you do then I have news for you. For every Balducci, there are thousands of us
who know the truth. We'll fight with our very lives to present the truth to you.
What you do with the truth after that is up to you. But please, don't think that
just because a person has a title before his name that he or she represents the
majority of Christendom.
It is my heartfelt prayer that everyone who has
read this will be blessed with knowledge and wisdom from El Shaddai (God
Almighty) and that the impartation of wisdom that you receive will guide you in
the knowledge of Yahweh's own truth. And I pray a hedge of thorns around you so
that the enemy of Yahweh will not be able to lie to you while Yahweh is showing
you the truth. Be blessed in Yeshua Ha Mashiach (Jesus Christ). Amen
David Ben Yakov