ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT LEGISLATION
AND HOW IT WILL BENEFIT THE ULTIMATE ILLEGAL ALIEN
By David Ben Yakov
As I write this article we are more than half way through the year 2007. The big issue this year is the illegal alien question. Many here in America are worried about the influx of undocumented people coming across our border with Mexico and to some extent, our border with Canada. It is unfortunate that the Mexican people get the blame for all of this. I've met a lot of newcomers to this nation and I have to say that very few are of Mexican extraction. Most come from places south of Mexico, such as Guatemala, Honduras, El Salvador and various other Latin American countries. Mexico is simply the land through which they have made their exodus. Granted, there are problems in this area and all we can do is hope and pray that both governments will work things out for the good of all people. Knowing governments the way that we do, this would take a miracle, but we serve a God of Miracles!!
Having taken a look at many of the older American historical documents I have noticed that those of them that refer to human rights for the individual almost all refer to "men" or at the very least "people." Let's take a look at the preamble of the US Constitution:
We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
And the beginning of the United States Declaration of Independence:
When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed.....
And the Bill of Rights - Amendments to the Constitution:
The Conventions of a number of the States having, at the time of adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added, and as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government will best insure the beneficent ends of its institution;
Resolved, by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America, in Congress assembled, two-thirds of both Houses concurring, that the following articles be proposed to the Legislatures of the several States, as amendments to the Constitution of the United States; all or any of which articles, when ratified by three-fourths of the said Legislatures, to be valid to all intents and purposes as part of the said Constitution, namely:
Amendment I
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
Amendment II
A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.
Amendment III
No soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.
Amendment IV
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
Amendment V
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
Amendment VI
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.
Amendment VII
In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise reexamined in any court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.
Amendment VIII
Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.
Amendment IX
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
Amendment X
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.
Many other binding and lawful historical documents have the same theme in them...that the documents pertain to mankind, people if you will, and that they were written to protect the people that were governed under them. They were written by human beings to govern over human beings. When we look at the words, "mankind," and "men," we are sure what the context is. Those words always pertain to humans, or humanity. The word "people" however is sort of vague, or perhaps it is that way because its meaning has been corrupted over the years. Some have asked me "what kind of people do you suppose live on other planets?" Other people have asked me "what sort of people pilot UFO's?" Those are valid questions, but those who ask them use the word people inaccurately. Here is the definition of "people," as found in the Merriam Webster Dictionary:
Main Entry: 1peo·ple
Pronunciation: 'pE-p&l
Function: noun
Inflected Form(s): plural people
Etymology: Middle English peple, from Anglo-French pople, peple, peuple, from Latin populus
1 plural : human beings making up a group or assembly or linked by a common interest
2 plural : HUMAN BEINGS, PERSONS -- often used in compounds instead of persons <salespeople> -- often used attributively <people skills>
3 plural : the members of a family or kinship
4 plural : the mass of a community as distinguished from a special class <disputes between the people and the nobles> -- often used by Communists to distinguish Communists from other people
5 plural peoples : a body of persons that are united by a common culture, tradition, or sense of kinship, that typically have common language, institutions, and beliefs, and that often constitute a politically organized group
6 : the body of enfranchised citizens of a state
So, it isn't hard, after reading the definition above, that the word, "people," refers to human beings exclusively. So, in answer to those who ask me the questions I mentioned above; there aren't any people on other worlds, nor are there any people piloting UFOs, per se, because people are human beings and are from earth and nowhere else. This does not apply however to any UFO's that are from earth and are piloted by human beings. There are two types of UFO's at least; human engineered with alien technology, and alien or physically manifested spiritual UFOs. More valid terms for the questions asked above would be, "beings," or "entities," are the ones that pilot spiritual UFOs.
Another word that is used in many of the historical documents, is the word "person." Just like we did above. Why don't we take a look at what the meaning is for the word "person."
Main Entry: per·son
Pronunciation: 'p&r-s&n
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English, from Anglo-French persone, from Latin persona actor's mask, character in a play, person, probably from Etruscan phersu mask, from Greek prosOpa, plural of prosOpon face, mask -- more at PROSOPOPOEIA
1 : HUMAN, INDIVIDUAL -- sometimes used in combination especially by those who prefer to avoid man in compounds applicable to both sexes <chairperson> <spokesperson>
2 : a character or part in or as if in a play : GUISE
3 a : one of the three modes of being in the Trinitarian Godhead as understood by Christians b : the unitary personality of Christ that unites the divine and human natures
4 a archaic : bodily appearance b : the body of a human being; also : the body and clothing <unlawful search of the person>
5 : the personality of a human being : SELF
6 : one (as a human being, a partnership, or a corporation) that is recognized by law as the subject of rights and duties
7 : reference of a segment of discourse to the speaker, to one spoken to, or to one spoken of as indicated by means of certain pronouns or in many languages by verb inflection
So, from looking at the definition for "person," in the Merriam Webster Dictionary, we can plainly see that it is a singular form for the word "people." We can also see that it always pertains to human beings. There is no doubt whatsoever that the documents that our forefathers drafted for the protection of the populace, was dedicated to and limited to mankind, namely, human beings. So why am I so adamant about this subject?? We'll now examine current vernacular as it is being passed off to the public, either knowingly or unknowingly by the government and the news media.
MODERN VERNACULAR AS IT APPLIES TO IMMIGRANT LEGISLATION
We looked at some of the documents that our forefathers drafted for our protection and welfare. We determined, by doing a short word study, that those words showed that the documents applied to human beings exclusively. I find it interesting that those men had the insight to refer to mankind at all. I mean, after all, what else could there have been at the time that they drafted those wonderful documents. For instance, they could have said, "everyone is created equal." Some might say that they referred to "men" because they were sexist and didn't want to include women in their document. I don't think that this was the case. They could have said that all "males" were considered equal if that is what they meant. These were for the most part Christian men who would have known that they were to love their wives as, "Christ loves the Church." We also know that the Founding Fathers spoke a more pure English, and English that derived from Elizabethan English, which is the same language that the King James Bible was penned in. In the Bible, the word "men," when used in this context always refers to mankind.
Some could argue that the founding fathers were trying to distinguish between white men and black, or white and Native American. Any study of history will show that a minority of the founding fathers did have servants, who some might refer to as slaves, but in most cases those servants were cared for well, many times achieving freedom for themselves at which time they stayed with their former owners to serve further with them as free employees. So the thought that the founding fathers thought of the African servants as less than human is probably null and void and would not cause them to differentiate them from the rest of mankind in the documents. Furthermore, when Protestants arrived in America they saw the Native American, not a a subhuman individual, but as a savage or a heathen. The same thought ran through the minds of the missionaries who ran into the Germanic and Slavic tribes in Europe when Christianity spread in that area. They weren't seen as sub humans, but people who were steeped in hedonism and the occult and who needed to be saved by the blood of Yeshua Ha Mashiach. So, we can be pretty well sure that when the founding fathers used the words "men" in their documents, they were referring to ALL descendents of Noah, that is all of them who are human beings. We have to wonder if they were cognizant of the fact that there would come a time when other beings would try to establish an identity within our society. Maybe they were aware of the scripture in the book of Daniel:
And whereas thou sawest iron mixed with miry clay, they shall mingle themselves with the seed of men: but they shall not cleave one to another, even as iron is not mixed with clay. Daniel 2:43
In modern society, with the drafting of laws and such, we have a large hurdle to jump; that being political correctness. Society has fractioned into splinter groups, each demanding equal rights, but wanting to be more equal than the other groups. It's sort of like a political gangland out there; each group marking out its territory and using "sensitivity" as a weapon to gain ground. We've all seen how the political correctness game is played and most of us have probably been victims of it at least once. Yeshua warned us that this would happen before He came back to earth:
For nation shall rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom: and there shall be famines, and pestilences, and earthquakes, in divers places. Matthew 24:7
The Greek word for "nation" in this passage of scripture is "ethnos." It is where we get our word "ethnic" from.
Main Entry: 1eth·nic
Pronunciation: 'eth-nik
Function: adjective
Etymology: Middle English, from Late Latin ethnicus, from Greek ethnikos national, gentile, from ethnos nation, people; akin to Greek Ethos custom
1 : HEATHEN
2 a : of or relating to large groups of people classed according to common racial, national, tribal, religious, linguistic, or cultural origin or background <ethnic minorities> <ethnic enclaves> b : being a member of a specified ethnic group <an ethnic German> c : of, relating to, or characteristic of ethnics <ethnic neighborhoods> <ethnic foods>
So what Yeshua was saying in essence, is that racial group would rise against racial group; or that ethnic groups would rise up against each other. This is true in many lands today. Here in America, it is so very prevalent. You see, in order for this to happen, a society has to be fragmented. Satan, though he be insane, is a tactful military commander. He knows the meaning of divide and conquer. For a people to have cohesion, they have to have a common purpose; one steady foundation. In the founding of America, that foundation was Yahweh; the God of Abraham, Yitzak and Ya'acov. In former times, the vast majority of society agreed that Yahweh was the glue that held things together. Jews, Protestants and Catholics all agreed that there were certain tenants that needed to be adhered to in order to make society work. They might not have agreed with each other's theology and they might have even had disdain for each other from time to time, but they all agreed that Yahweh's laws had a cohesive factor, and they abided by those laws.
And it is true that in earlier days, those who came to America, even if they worshipped other gods or didn't worship a god at all; had respect for the foundation upon which the nation was built upon. They all came to America to be Americans and to leave their lands and allegiances behind; to make America their land and give their allegiance to their new land. But things started to change about two thirds of the way through the 20th century.
In the latter part of the century peoples started to arrive from all over the world. They didn't come with the express desire to leave the old behind and to assimilate. They came with the notion that they could be extensions of the lands that they left; little sovereign nations within the corporation of America. They knew that America offered freedom, but they denied the basic theme of what made America great; that being, assimilation into American society. So now America is like a dog that is nursing and there are not enough nipples for all of the puppies. Had the puppies the wherewithal to realize that there is enough milk for all, and that everyone must wait their turn, then the feeding would be orderly and fruitful. Instead, each puppy thinks that it has more right to the milk than the others, so there is a constant shoving and growling as they all try to work out a pecking order. I think that people should think about the words of the Pledge of Allegiance, which state: "one nation, under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all." The flip side of the coin is more realistic these days; "a fractured nation that is not under God (Yahweh), horribly divided, with liberty and justice for anyone who can turn out the largest numbers in the street to protest."
Keep An Eye On The Words
The thing that we, as citizens in a mostly free society need to be careful of is how words are used in the proposal of new legislation. I think we can all agree that those in public office and many in the judicial realm are corrupt. Most politicians, most lawyers and a fairly large amount of judges are in their professions for money or power. A fraction of a fraction of their populations love Yahweh, let alone know Him. If they're not righteous people and Yahweh is the farthest thing from their mind then they can't help but to use their position for personal gain or to climb the power ladder. There have been numerous accounts in recent years of legislators passing into law legislation that they have never read thoroughly, if they've read it at all. This is a pretty serious matter, to say the least.
Politicians for the most part, do not care about right and wrong anymore. They've cast away any scruples that they might have once possessed and they have traded them in for greed and power. They give to the masses of people what they cry for, even it if it is detrimental to those people, whether immediately or a long way down the road. As people become accustom to getting what they want, they start to trust their leaders for many decisions and after a longer while, they trust their leaders with every decision. Here is an analogy. Let's say that there are one hundred kids on a field trip and only three adults watching them. All of the kids want candy to eat, but the three adults say that it is not a good idea because it will help to advance tooth decay. But the candy vendor tells all of the kids that the candy will be free, as long as they eat his candy. So, kids being the way that they are demand that the three adults let them have the free candy. After a while of complaining and whining the kids have their way and they get free candy from the vendor. So there are other groups of kids there too and they start to complain to the vendor, telling him that they want free candy too. They too get the free candy. Well, a few months progress and the children are happy with their free candy but then things start to happen. Some of the children develop tooth decay, others are becoming obese and in a few others, all of the sugar has exacerbated their diabetes.
I bet you thought this was the end of the story, right? Well, it only gets worse. The candy vendor starts to get complaints from the children. They're mad at the vendor and want him to do something. So the candy vendor says, "no problem, I just happen to have brothers, one is an excellent dentist, another is a renown dietician and the third is an endocrinologist and all three can help you with your problems. The only thing that you'll need to do is let me tax your allowance so that everyone can have these services." But, what he doesn't tell them is that they are now wards of his little enterprise and slaves to him and his relatives. So just a couple of words, "free candy" started problems that have major implications. I think that it was so aptly put in the movie, "Hunt For Red October," when the politician in the movie said to the main character, "I'm a politician, and when I'm not kissing babies, I'm trying to figure out ways to steal their lollypops." When we see legislation in any form the first thing that should come to our minds is, "what is in it for the writers of the legislation and how is it going to advance their position or their agenda, either now or in the long term scenario."
If anyone reading this were to take a look at the legislation that has been passed over the past twenty five years or so, they would realize that wordings have been used differently. For instance, the word "people" never really refers to everyone in the corporate body of all the American people. Instead, it is used to refer to subsets or individual groups of people in our society. Since society is so fractured it could never be used to accurately refer to the American People as a whole. When you hear any politician use the term, "the people," or "the will of the people," he or she isn't referring to America as a whole, but only to those who are screaming the loudest or the largest constituent body that they can influence.
For many years the term "illegal alien" was used to refer to any person (from anywhere, not just Latin America) who entered the United States without proper permission. Look at the words:
Main Entry: 1il·le·gal
Pronunciation: (")i(l)-'lE-g&l
Function: adjective
Etymology: Middle French or Medieval Latin; Middle French illegal, from Medieval Latin illegalis, from Latin in- + legalis legal
: not according to or authorized by law : UNLAWFUL, ILLICIT; also : not sanctioned by official rules (as of a game)
And:
Main Entry: alien
Function: noun
1 : a person of another family, race, or nation
2 : a foreign-born resident who has not been naturalized and is still a subject or citizen of a foreign country; broadly : a foreign-born citizen
3 : EXTRATERRESTRIAL
4 : EXOTIC 1
It is quite evident to see that the title, "illegal alien" refers to a foreign born resident who has not been naturalized, and who broke the law to get here." Keep in mind that one of the meanings of "alien" is "extraterrestrial," because that will figure into the equation later.
We have to remember though, that we live in an age of "political correctness," and the politico's have said that the name, "illegal alien," isn't a nice word because it could hurt the feelings of people. So in order not to offend those who have skirted around the law, a new term was invented; a more friendly term; "undocumented workers." Let's take a look and see that those two words mean:
Main Entry: un·doc·u·ment·ed
Pronunciation: &n-'dä-ky&-"men-t&d
Function: adjective
: not documented: as a : not supported by documentary evidence <undocumented expenditures> b : lacking documents required for legal immigration or residence
And:
Main Entry: work·er
Pronunciation: 'w&r-k&r
Function: noun
1 a : one that works especially at manual or industrial labor or with a particular material <a factory worker> -- often used in combination b : a member of the working class
2 : any of the sexually underdeveloped and usually sterile members of a colony of social ants, bees, wasps, or termites that perform most of the labor and protective duties of the colony
We see again that the meanings fit quite well into the scenario that is presented to us these days. The politico's try to get around the alien issue by calling the illegal's "workers," which is true, most are very hard workers. But, if you look at the word "undocumented" we see that it still says that they are illegal immigrants. The same thing is said, but with what sounds like, kinder words.
The changing of the wording for the classification of the illegal aliens is done for two reasons. The first reason is for political correctness. It makes the person who has entered illegally feel better, like they're being accepted into society. To them, they are no longer an alien, but someone who is contributing to society. It gives one a sense of having stepped up one rung on the ladder. The second reason is for a changing of the opinion of the populace that is concerned about the influx of who they see as invaders to their land. It elevates the alien from criminal status to one of an individual who just has not gotten the proper paperwork and gives the assumption that the correct paperwork will remove the crime, and the punishment from the crime from the person who entered the nation illegally. It puts a different facade on the status of the illegal alien and it removes the criminal act from that person and makes them look like a victim, rather than a law breaker. The manipulation of wording is a skill that has its roots all the way back in the Garden of Eden, where the Nachash told Chava that if she ate the fruit, it would not kill her, but would open her eyes and she would be like God. That manipulation of words had profound effects on she and her husband, and billions upon billions of their children. The second definition, the one about a worker being a member of a colony is important and will be referred to soon, because it refers to those who will try to slip in under the radar of future legislation.
A Short Interjection Before We Move On:
I think that at this point I should bring some clarity to my position on this whole "illegal alien" issue. I am pro-immigration. All of my ancestors came from other lands; Denmark, Germany, Italy, Czechoslovakia and Poland. If I was against legal immigration I would be the chiefest of hypocrites because I would be denying my own family history. But, I am for legal entry into our land. My ancestors all came from their homelands and denounced their allegiances to those lands. They still kept parts of their cultures, but they kept it in their homes and were assimilated Americans outside of their homes. After a couple of generations they were all Americans, and nothing else. This is the ideal of becoming an American.
I have to admit to everyone that for a few short years I had a chip on my shoulder about illegal aliens. It still concerns me that it is happening because I like my country, and the freedoms that are afforded to me, and the American lifestyle (minus the sin and hedonism of course). But one day Yahweh got a hold of me during a time of prayer and he explained to me all about Leviticus chapter 26, where Yahweh tells Israel that if they abide by His laws, they would be blessed, but in turn if they ridicule and mock Yahweh by turning to other Gods and rejecting Yahweh, there would be negative implications for their actions. One of the negative results was that Yahweh would have foreigners come in and possess the land. Since our founding fathers, and generations that succeeded them placed the United States under the authority of Yahweh, then these same rules apply to this nation. The result of our turning away from Yahweh, his laws and his love and grace is, aside from many of the other promises in Leviticus, that foreigners have rushed over our borders in great numbers...and people are waking up to find this judgment of Yahweh coming upon us. We are quick to blame the aliens; to want to kick them out and to shut the borders. But if Yahweh is using them for a judgment, who is really to blame......we are.
But Yahweh had more to say on the subject. For two centuries America sent out many missionaries to foreign lands to preach to the lost of those lands. Back around the time of the 200th birthday of the United States we took a turn toward the worse, setting our sights on ungodly things, and even passing legislation to make ungodly things legal and protected under the law. As each year progressed we became more ungodly and...we sent less and less missionaries out to the lost of foreign lands. The thing is that these people still need to hear the Gospel of Yeshua Ha Mashiach. So Yeshua told me, one of the reasons why so many people are flooding over the borders is this, "since you won't go out and preach to the lost, I am bringing the lost to you." Many of those who are spilling over our borders have been chosen from before time began, for salvation and Yahweh is going to use any method that He can to bring the message to these people. So what we as believers in Yeshua need to be doing is we need to step off of our high horses, humble ourselves, and start asking these people to come to church. We need to introduce them to Yeshua. They're not going to get a relationship with Him through the Catholic Church...we need to show Him to them. So if anyone reading this has hatred for illegal aliens, I would suggest that you put aside your hatred and pick up Yeshua's banner and lead the lost to salvation in Him. And when you think about it, what action do you really think He would favor??
So, Who Else Could Benefit From New Legislation?
I think that just about all of you who are reading this can agree that we live in a strange society, and it is getting stranger every day. For reasons why only Yahweh knows, he has chosen for me to live in the capital state of that strangeness, California. Every strange and bizarre fad comes from one of two places on earth, Europe and California.
Over the past forty years or so there has been a push for people to believe that animals should be given special rights status. The main impetus of this push comes from socialist circles and from those associated with the environmental movement, all which seem to adhere philosophically more to the Hindu, Buddhist and other eastern religious ways of looking at things. Much of the animal's rights premise has its roots in Hinduism and their belief in reincarnation. Because of their belief in this, and their belief in karma, there is a conception that some relatives might have been reincarnated into certain animals, therefore those animals have rights.
In the environmental movement these thoughts have been further perverted into the belief that lower life forms have rights and even trees and other flora have rights also. Not too far from Sacramento lies the town of Davis. Davis is a university town, and with that title is attached a strangeness that is all its own. Several years ago the good people of Davis noticed that frogs were dying on a certain road during mating season. So, the city spent fourteen thousand dollars to build a frog tunnel under the road. The frogs don't care though, and they ignore the tunnel and still get run over. Yet another story about this insanity is illustrated in the great butterfly caper. Seems that some of the wonderful people of Davis realized that when cars drove on a road that traversed through farm land, there were a lot of yellow butterflies killed by the cars on that road. Their solution was to propose legislation that the road not be used at certain hours of the day to protect the insect. Thank Yahweh that cooler heads prevailed and that this major thoroughfare did not close down.
Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools, And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things. Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves: Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen. Romans 1:22-25
I think that it is quite interesting that the place where these sort of practices are performed is in the college towns. It is in these towns where people profess themselves to be wise, the most foolish things are done. The education of a righteous man or woman is a wonderful thing and it will be used for the glory of Yahweh, but an education in the hands of immoral and ungodly person is like letting a gorilla play with a case of nitroglycerin.
But aside from animals and other earth creatures, what other beings will modern society ascribe rights too?? Over the past four decades our society has been bombarded with the notion that there is life somewhere out in the universe. The American space agency, known as NASA (National Aeronautic and Space Administration) has recently taken off the facade that it has worn for all of these years; now saying that they are now interested in finding life in places other than earth. For many years they kept up the masquerade, telling us that they were interesting in exploring space for the purpose of colonizing it. But those of us who knew better had them figured out long ago. I mean, why send the Voyager craft with a plaque telling of our location in space and a gold recording album introducing us to "whomever is out there," if they didn't have an agenda. No, the purpose has always been to find life and discredit Yahweh's Word, and Yahweh Himself. But to this date, nothing has been found, and it is our contention that no corporeal life will be found either.
While those of us in the Messianic realm who have studied the origins of UFO's, extraterrestrials and the like have found that these entities are fallen angels, the world still believes that they are visitors from other worlds, or from our future, or ascended masters who have evolved into higher life forms. Because of the status that the world bestows them, they are the ultimate alien; not from the confines of earth, but visitors from the vast reaches of space. The fact that they play tag with our military aircraft, appear on the scene uninvited and abduct people against their will is pretty good evidence that they are here illegally. Let's look at our definitions again:
Main Entry: alien
Function: noun
1 : a person of another family, race, or nation
2 : a foreign-born resident who has not been naturalized and is still a subject or citizen of a foreign country; broadly : a foreign-born citizen
3 : EXTRATERRESTRIAL
4 : EXOTIC 1
And:
Main Entry: 1il·le·gal
Pronunciation: (")i(l)-'lE-g&l
Function: adjective
Etymology: Middle French or Medieval Latin; Middle French illegal, from Medieval Latin illegalis, from Latin in- + legalis legal
: not according to or authorized by law : UNLAWFUL, ILLICIT; also : not sanctioned by official rules (as of a game)
Now let's talk about where they claim to be from. Well, before mankind had the ability to reach into space, these entities claimed to be from Venus and other planets in our own solar system. Then with the advent of space travel, and mankind's ability to visit Venus and the other planets, the story of these beings changed and now they say that they from a variety of places like Orion, the Pleiades, Sirius and other star systems. Whatever way you look at it, if their claims were true (which they're not) they would certainly be extraterrestrial. Remember that extraterrestrial means "outside of earth."
The word illegal is an apt description of what they are doing. While there is no law that I know of that prohibits extraterrestrials or their craft from entering the earth's atmosphere, there is an implied infraction because all of earth, including the sky, and probably beyond to the edges of the Van Allen Belt are Earth Territory. Entering into someone's territory without permission is illegal here on earth. Furthermore, the airspace above every nation is sovereign to that nation. Just try to enter any nation's airspace without permission and see what happens. If they think you're hostile they'll shoot you down and if not they will order you to the nearest airport where the authorities will be waiting to haul you away. It is clear that in the early days of modern UFO activity that the US government considered UFO's and their occupants to be illegal, even hostile citing the reports that we have of our military trying to shoot them down. Take into account also that kidnapping is a federal crime here in the states. Every year there are more and more reports of people taken against their will by these beings. Also take into account that these beings conduct procedures on their captives that are tantamount to torture. Threats are made against the captives lives and if the reports are true, some have been killed.
So we have beings who claim to be from other worlds thus making them aliens to our world. They're not legal and lack documentation for being here. So that is the breaking of the first law. The second illegal act is kidnapping. The third illegal act is torture and the fourth illegal act is murder. A score of other illegal acts can be added to the mix including: rape, trespassing on private property, loitering, use of a deadly weapon, many environmental laws and others. These are not good beings...nor do they have good intent.
We mentioned before how the wording is being changed in our day and age to make the illegal alien look more like a worker that just doesn't have the correct paperwork. Instead of the label of "illegal alien," we're being indoctrinated to accept the term, "undocumented worker." Let's look at the verbiage again:
Main Entry: un·doc·u·ment·ed
Pronunciation: &n-'dä-ky&-"men-t&d
Function: adjective
: not documented: as a : not supported by documentary evidence <undocumented expenditures> b : lacking documents required for legal immigration or residence
And:
Main Entry: work·er
Pronunciation: 'w&r-k&r
Function: noun
1 a : one that works especially at manual or industrial labor or with a particular material <a factory worker> -- often used in combination b : a member of the working class
2 : any of the sexually underdeveloped and usually sterile members of a colony of social ants, bees, wasps, or termites that perform most of the labor and protective duties of the colony
These two definitions are very interesting when it comes to the UFO and its occupants. Remember, they claim to be from other worlds...corporeal life so to speak. Let's look at these words and see how the words apply.
Well, first we need to look to see if there is any documentary evidence that UFO's exist. They are very secretive beings, coming mostly in the night in a stealth manner. For the most part, they don't want to be exposed very much, only enough to keep themselves in the back of our minds. The governments of the world have gone out of their way to deny their existence and giving the public very little if any documentary evidence that they exist. We see also that the meaning of "undocumented" is much akin to "illegal," in fact it is just a nice way of saying illegal.
The first meaning for the word "worker" is in itself archaic. There are many workers, such as social workers and legal aid workers who aren't involved in manual or industrial skills. From the information that has been carried back from those who have been abducted, and those who are channeling messages from these supposed "aliens," they want the people of earth to think of them as interstellar social workers. They claim that mankind is on the verge of extinction, or that earth is about to go through some horrible times, and they are here to help us. They're here to aid in our next step of evolution they say. Oh, and my favorite one, "they're here to show us the right way because the Bible and Christianity have polluted the true intent of the universe."
What I found interesting though was the second meaning of the word "worker," as being, any underdeveloped and usually sterile member of a colony of social ants, bees, wasps or termites that perform most of the labor and protective duties of the colony. The first thing that struck me was that a lot of people say that when they've been abducted, their captors reminded them of insects. Many say that the beings who were in control looked like praying mantis' or some sort of other insect. Many abductees have reported that their captors had no visible sexual organs. The captives have also reported that sperm and ovum have been taken from them; that action being explained by their captors as an attempt to make hybrids between themselves and humans. And another thing that was striking is that some of the abductees have reported that the "aliens" seemed to work in what they describe as a "hive mentality," that they all work together like ants or bees would do in a hive. The parallels between the definitions and the actions of the supposed extraterrestrials is striking to say the least.
What's It All Add Up To?
Well, it is quite simple when you think about it. We've seen how the globalists have taken what is an illegal entry into a country and how they have equated it to being just a poor undocumented worker that just needs the right paperwork to be here legally. When they talk, they rarely use the words, people or person. They've taken the individual out of the equation and have replace him/her with social groups, races and nationalities. The next step will be to equate all people of earth under one banner, under one world. There will be a vacuum left when the whole world is under one banner and this will be natural because every person wants to be an individual and to be a part of a special subset. In science we learned that vacuums like to be filled, and this one will be filled by the introduction of the extraterrestrial into the everyday life of human beings. Of course we know that they will be fallen angels and perhaps demon possessed drones in the disguise of space aliens.
There will be many on earth who will oppose these entities. Humans aren't too kind when it comes to accepting people or things that are unfamiliar. But the entities will explain that they know that they aren't from here and aren't provided for by law. They will say that they are "workers" who have been here for a long time, observing humans and helping us along in our evolution. They've been our interstellar social workers and just want to help. It's a probability that immigration law will have a loophole that they will fit quite nicely through too. So with the help of the globalists, and the ignorance of most human beings, the "space brothers" will be accepted into society. So it is important to know that whether through ignorance or blindness to the situation, or through willful doing, our leaders are putting into law, or will put into law, legislation that will allow fallen angels in the guise of space aliens enter into our society and lead many astray.
What does this mean for the Christian, the Messianic believers in Yeshua? Well we have to look again at how words are being manipulated by those in power. One of the key words today is the word Fundamentalist. The word means someone who sticks to the fundamentals of what they believe. For the true believer in Yeshua, it means that we take God's Word (the Bible) to be the inspired Word of the Living God. The fundamental person believes that the Bible is uncorrupted from cover to cover and that it takes precedence over all other written words and the laws of men, especially when those laws go against the tenants of God and His Word.
Back in the middle of the 20th century some citizens saw the need to form militia groups here in the states. All of them saw the erosion of American society and corruption of the American government and legal system and it concerned them. These groups were divided into two camps, the secular camp that stored food up in the hills to prepare for a bad day; and the religious camp who saw Armageddon looming on the horizon. The second camp was divided into two camps; one being the strange groups, people of religious fanaticism and Christian cults. The other group was just a group that wanted to have a place to get away when things started to get bad. They wanted to move their people away from all of the craziness; to keep them in the seclusion of the back country and to protect themselves from what they assume will be anarchy in its highest degree.
Well, as the 80's and 90's progressed some of these militias turned anti-government and the government took notice. The government infiltrated these groups, jailing some, killing others and chasing the fugitives who escaped them. Because many of these groups had some sort of religious dogma, they were labeled as religious fundamentalists. The name was changed later to "Christian Fundamentalist" because many of these groups' religious values that were based on a New Testament foundation. But unfortunate for many, the news media and the government began to label all of these groups as Christian Fundamentalists. Later the media and the government expanded the definition to anyone who holds the Bible to be sacred, the Word of God.
To make matters worse for anyone who considered themselves a fundamentalist; there came on the horizon another group that was labeled as fundamentalists. Islamic terrorists came on the scene and the media and the politicos started with their word games yet again. Because these terrorists were Islamic, and most of the Oil Producing nations are Islamic nation too, it was thought best that political correctness be applied yet again. So, instead of being called terrorists, they were now referred to as Fundamentalist Islam. Whether this was put into force because we didn't want to offend the terrorists, or if maybe we didn't want to effect the flow of oil, probably will only be known by a select few. In 2001 a group of these terrorists commandeered some commercial airliners and crashed them into the World Trade Center in New York, and also the Pentagon in Washington. President Bush declared war on the terrorists, mainly Al-Qaeda, but after that time most terrorist organizations rallied around Al-Qaeda and thus they are today.
The thing about all of this is that now when the American public hears the word "fundamentalist," they immediately think of the terrorists, those in fragments of the militia and also any group that the media thinks it is expedient to malign. But what about the hard working Christian who thinks that the Bible is the inerrant Word of God. This person is a good person, a moral person, a model of society; never hurting anyone and wanting to bring salvation to his friends and family. Well, according to the label that the politicos and media have manufactured, this person falls into the "evil fundamentalist" mold and is dangerous to everyone. I think that it is proper to assume that if anyone reading this has publicly proclaimed your faith in Yeshua, or have argued in favor of the Bible or any other thing that the politicos think of as dangerous, then you are on a list somewhere and listed as a fundamentalist or a fanatic.
So how does all of this fit into the future, when angelic entities come to earth posing as helpers of humanity, and salvation for humankind? Well, those of us who love Yahweh will know the truth. We will proclaim the truth to the world and try to bring God's knowledge of this matter to anyone who will want to listen to us. And what will happen to us for doing what is right? Well, let's take a look at what the politicos and the media are saying about those who are angry about the current illegal immigrant situation. This very day, if any of us were to go onto television, the radio or send a letter to the newspaper in regard to feelings about the issue, there would be some very immediate responses. First and foremost, you would be described as a racist. You would be labeled as someone who doesn't like people of Latin extraction. Second, you would be labeled as intolerant of people who are oppressed and just want a better life here in the States. You would probably be called other things like; uncaring, unloving, unsympathetic; a bigot in the strongest sense of the term. And this would all happen because you, being a good and law abiding citizen were upset about illegal activity.
Now let's take the scenario one step higher. You wake up one morning and turn on the news. You hear excitement in the voice of the commentator as he tells the story of how strange craft have landed at key locations all over the world. They've landed at the United Nations, the Capitol in Washington DC, the Kremlin, the Hague in the Netherlands, Mexico City; all the capitols of all the nations on earth and even at some of the larger populations centers around the world. As he talks, the door opens on that craft and strange creatures come out of the craft; or maybe, they are beautiful looking, almost angelic in appearance. They tell the world that they have come here to avert a tragedy, to save a world that is plummeting into chaos. They tell of how they have pushed mankind along for many years, coming to us in the personages of Moses, Yeshua, Mohammed, Buddha, Krishna and many others. The world accepts these new saviors, all but one group; that being Fundamentalist Christians. Then the campaign steps up. The believers in Yeshua try to tell everyone that will listen that these are fallen angels and that their message is a lie. But in the mean time, these beings help mankind in miraculous ways; ending many diseases, bringing a peace around the world, ending hunger and many other things.
So what will happen to the believers in Yeshua within such a scenario? In the beginning they will be labeled as haters, racists, bigots, terrorists and as those who are opposed to the cosmic evolution of mankind via these entities. There will be no tolerance for believers in Yeshua. We will be labeled as the ones who belong to the religion that has never gotten along with any of the others. How dare you believers in Yeshua come against our space brothers. You've preached sin and hell to us for thousands of years but our space brothers tell us that we will all become gods; that we all have potential to become one with the universe. We don't want you around anymore, you who believe in Yeshua. And as we keep trying to preach the Gospel we will be hated for the love that we try to sew. Then will the full fulfillment of the prophecy come true:
Then shall they deliver you up to be afflicted, and shall kill you: and ye shall be hated of all nations for my name's sake. And then shall many be offended, and shall betray one another, and shall hate one another. And many false prophets shall rise, and shall deceive many. And because iniquity shall abound, the love of many shall wax cold. But he that shall endure unto the end, the same shall be saved. Matthew 24:9-13
We can see a lot of parallels between what the attitudes of the politically correct crowd think now about those who try to speak the truth and what is bound to happen when the ultimate illegal aliens come to earth. People will always be people. A vast majority of people like to think that they can ruminate for themselves, but the sad reality is that most believe whatever lie is presented to them. This is especially true when the liar presents them with gifts, giving them the things that they want, not the things that they need. Today people want to be altruistic because it makes them feel better. They'll cling on to any cause that sounds good to them but they always seem to neglect looking down the road to what their actions might lead to. Today their cause is to fight for the illegal alien without thinking that the influx of so many people into American society illegally will bankrupt the social systems and many of the other systems that are barely surviving, even without that influx. As usual, people tend to think of today, and not tomorrow. With the fallen angel scenario, people will buy the lie because they see immediate comfort and a quick fix to all of earth's social problems, but in the long run, it follow a course that will lead to the destruction of countless souls and of all of mankind as well as the destruction of earth. But we have the promise of Yeshua, that He will come back to save both earth and mankind before Satan can achieve his ultimate goal.
For then shall be great tribulation, such as was not since the beginning of the world to this time, no, nor ever shall be. And except those days should be shortened, there should no flesh be saved: but for the elect's sake those days shall be shortened. Matthew 24:21-22
Things To Consider:
I'd like to address now, those who know that they're believers in Yeshua Ha Mashiach (Jesus Christ). Those who know Him in their heart. Those who have had a born again experience and live a born again life; those who have the Ruach Ha Kodesh (Holy Spirit) residing within them. As much as I really do not like the little Christian fads that come up from time to time, I have to use one of the phrases that is said so often; What Would Jesus Do? I think that if we applied that to every situation that comes into our lives, and even every little decision that we make each day, we would be much better for or short walk in this world.
In short, we need to evangelize the world. We need to prepare every soul that will listen to be ready for what is shortly coming down the road. We need to seek the heart of Yeshua so much more than we have been doing. We need to stop playing games with Yahweh and we need to get serious about our walk with Him. We need to start doing these things TODAY because what we do today will determine what our lives are like when the persecution and hatred comes to us. If we're strong in Yeshua now we'll be even stronger when the hard times come. If we just languor in our pettiness every day and act like these times aren't coming to us then when they do come they'll take us by surprise and many will fall away out of fear and lack of faith. It's simple brothers and sisters; we need to seek Yeshua. We need to ask HIM what HE wants us to do, no matter how crazy or how off the wall it sounds. Sure, you'll be known as a nut, as a religious fanatic and some might even think of you as being dangerous. They thought all of that about Yeshua, but when you think of it, what does the name "Christian," mean? It means "Christ-like," like Yeshua, just like HIM.
My pastor told a story this past Sunday about a woman in a church who heard Yahweh tell her that she needed to do a cartwheel in front of the congregation. She asked the pastor if she should do what she heard. The pastor told her that if Yahweh told her to do it, then it wasn't stupid or silly, and that she should do it. So, she did it. After the service, a man approached the pastor and told him that he was totally amazed. He said that as the service started, he told Yahweh that if He was real, then He should have someone do a cartwheel in front of the church. He didn't think that anything would happen but after the woman did the cartwheel he knew that Yahweh heard him and he accepted Yeshua as his Adonai and savior that night. See, nothing is stupid or silly if Yahweh tells you to do it!! Let's listen to Yahweh, and heed His call and let's marvel at what He does with us and through us!! AMEN.
© Copyright 2007 David Ben Yakov (David Ruffino)